<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.158 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Wed, 22 May 2013 17:27:28 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Home</title><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 15:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.158 (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><item><title>Can Blue Stop PC Users From Seeing Red?</title><dc:creator>Mike Feibus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:07:41 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/5/9/can-blue-stop-pc-users-from-seeing-red.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1414047:16734394:33622599</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.feibustech.com/storage/SeeingRed_900.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1368112952575" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span>After more than a month of silently watching the blogosphere dissect early builds of Window Blue that were leaked on the internet, Microsoft this week has confirmed that Blue, the code name for Microsoft's follow-on to Windows 8, does in fact exist.</span></p>
<p>As of yet, Microsoft hasn't acknowledged any of the details that bloggers have uncovered. Representatives say only that Windows Blue is a response to what &nbsp;their customers have had to say about Windows 8. Hopefully, they have been listening, because an awful lot is riding on Windows Blue.</p>
<p>With all the hype and glitz surrounding smartphones and tablets, it's easy to lose sight of how critical a role the PC still plays in many of our lives. No, it's not the same role it played last year, or the year before. But for many of us -- certainly for most of us in IT -- a Windows PC is still a go-to device in our quiver of electronics tools. And because of the pace of change in the enterprise segment, Windows is guaranteed to play a central role for several more years at least.</p>
<p>In that sense, Microsoft isn't just gambling its own fortunes. It's messing with how many of us get things done every day.</p>
<p>That's why the anger over Windows 8 has been so palpable, and why fixing it has become so important. Forcing us to take longer, more circuitous routes to what we do every day feels like starting breakfast one morning only to find that your roommate has rearranged the kitchen. The more you reach for a fork in what's become the towel drawer, the angrier you get.</p>
<p>Can Windows Blue really stop PC users from seeing red? Read the entire column <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/software/windows8/windows-8-users-see-red-is-microsoft-lis/240154488">HERE</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.feibustech.com/home/rss-comments-entry-33622599.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Are Two Heads Better Than One at Intel?</title><dc:creator>Mike Feibus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 14:38:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/5/6/are-two-heads-better-than-one-at-intel.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1414047:16734394:33609233</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.feibustech.com/storage/TwoHeads_900.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1368115019494" alt="" /></span></span><span>When Brian Krzanich and Renee James, the newly appointed CEO and President of Intel, respectively, take over for the retiring Paul Otellini in two weeks, they won't have to look far for things that need tending. Indeed, they will have to hit the ground running to lead Intel through what is arguably the most treacherous patch the company has encountered in its 45-year history.</span></p>
<p>Read the entire column <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/processors/intel-decides-two-heads-better-than-one/240154141">HERE</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.feibustech.com/home/rss-comments-entry-33609233.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Pining for All-Day Battery Life</title><dc:creator>Mike Feibus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:19:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/3/29/pining-for-all-day-battery-life.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1414047:16734394:33170191</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.feibustech.com/storage/Battery_900b.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1367851457050" alt="" /></span></span>I dug out an old cellphone for a friend to use in a pinch. It was an&nbsp;</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LG_Shine_%28KE970%29">LG Shine</a><span>, a circa 2007 slider that was one of the glitzier feature phones in its day, albeit nothing to write home about in 2013.</span></p>
<p>Or so I thought. With all that's packed into our smartphones today, it's difficult to imagine the Shine as anything more than a quaint relic, an artifact harkening back to the days when consumers stole music but paid for 15-second ringtones of the same songs. But my friend was thrilled because the Shine lasted all day on a single charge. Many of us haven't seen that since, well, 2007.</p>
<p>As it turned out, 2007 was in fact the year that the market began downplaying battery life in exchange for performance, features and flexibility. Of course, the catalyst for the shift was not the LG Shine, but Apple's iPhone -- the device that ushered in the modern-day smartphone era.</p>
<p>Could 2013 be the year that the tide turns, and battery life becomes more important again?</p>
<p>Read the entire column <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/smartphone-battery-life-back-to-the-futu/240151953">HERE</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.feibustech.com/home/rss-comments-entry-33170191.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Signs that Microsoft Finally Gets It</title><dc:creator>Mike Feibus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:17:18 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/3/21/signs-that-microsoft-finally-gets-it.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1414047:16734394:33091091</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.feibustech.com/storage/Tragedy_Small.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1364573521260" alt="" /></span></span>The Windows 8 go-to-market plan last year played out like a Greek tragedy: the wounds that Microsoft endured&nbsp;</span>were almost entirely self-inflicted. Like when the company violated the trust of hardware partners by disclosing at the 11th hour that it was planning to build its own-branded tablets. Or by introducing Windows 8 in late October instead of midyear, when the first systems built for the new OS were coming available. Or by taking away the Start button and forcing users to contend with the Start screen, but not doing enough to court developers so that the go-to tablet apps were available for the so-called Modern UI at launch.</p>
<p>I bring this up not to pile on, but to point out some encouraging signs that Microsoft may - finally - comprehend the mess it's gotten itself into and is taking steps to right the ship. It had better. Because every quarter that passes with Windows 8 flapping in the breeze is another quarter that Android and iOS tablets become more entrenched in consumer usage patterns.</p>
<p>Read the entire column <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/software/windows8/4-signs-that-microsoft-finally-gets-it/240151360">HERE</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.feibustech.com/home/rss-comments-entry-33091091.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Seeking Answers to the Mobile Data Crunch</title><dc:creator>Mike Feibus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/3/8/seeking-answers-to-the-mobile-data-crunch.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1414047:16734394:32943597</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.feibustech.com/storage/PuzzleClouds_Small.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1363884234178" alt="" /></span></span>How ironic that for much of the middle two days of the four-day Congress -- the industry's flagship venue for showcasing the world's latest mobile devices, apps and transmission technology -- that the network in the convention center was so taxed attendees were unable to make calls or check email for hours at a time. Playing with any of the cool new apps was out of the question. Heck, calling someone to tell them you'd be late to a meeting was a roll of the dice.</span></p>
<p>Indeed, the only reliable means of communication was going old school with it on the 160-character Dino-Net.</p>
<p>The paucity of bandwidth at the mobile industry's own show underscores the urgency of the looming capacity crunch. I went to MWC, you may recall,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/2/23/mwc13-its-all-about-the-network.html">in search of answers to a problem</a>&nbsp;that, left unchecked, threatens to spoil the seemingly boundless explosion in mobile.</p>
<p>Read about what I learned <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/wireless-capacity-crunch-answers-at-mwc/240150308">HERE</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.feibustech.com/home/rss-comments-entry-32943597.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>#MWC13: It's All About the Network</title><dc:creator>Mike Feibus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:32:33 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/2/23/mwc13-its-all-about-the-network.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1414047:16734394:32863880</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.feibustech.com/storage/BigStock-CellularNet_Small.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1362767801531" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p class="firstP">I've got quite the laundry list of new mobile device technologies to evaluate at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona this coming week. The list is even larger than the one <a href="http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/1/6/must-see-trends-at-ces.html">I wrote about while en route to CES in January</a>.</p>
<p>But my number one priority at MWC won't be any of those cool new features for smartphones, tablets and PCs. First and foremost, I will be investigating alternatives for expanding wireless data capacity.</p>
<p><span>So why is a guy who makes a living analyzing mobile client technology trends paying such close attention to carrier deployment issues? It's simple: no one will use the cool new features if the wireless network doesn't have the capacity to support them.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>Read the entire column <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/mobile-world-congress-2013-what-we-want/240149123">HERE</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.feibustech.com/home/rss-comments-entry-32863880.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Why Seinfeld Won't Buy a Surface Pro (But Your Boss Might Buy One for You)</title><dc:creator>Mike Feibus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:02:19 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/2/11/why-seinfeld-wont-buy-a-surface-pro-but-your-boss-might-buy.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1414047:16734394:32794522</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="firstP"><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.feibustech.com/storage/Monkey_Small.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1361706252924" alt="" /></span></span>People who have monkeys for pets should just go ahead and have kids, Jerry Seinfeld years ago joked in a standup bit about pet ownership. "If you need a pet that can roller skate and smoke cigars, it's time to think about a family."</p>
<p>When you boil it down, that's why Microsoft's new Surface Pro won't rack up much in the way of sales. It's an awful lot of computer trapped inside the body of a tablet. Which means tradeoffs.</p>
<p>With apologies to Seinfeld, if you're thinking about Surface Pro ownership, then you're&nbsp;<em>so</em>&nbsp;close. Just go out and get a real computer.</p>
<p>Most consumers will do just that. Many enterprise buyers, however, will be ordering a few Surface Pro's. Click <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/desktop/microsoft-surface-pro-too-much-tablet/240148261">HERE </a>to find out why.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.feibustech.com/home/rss-comments-entry-32794522.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Model Years Can Help Lift PC Sales</title><dc:creator>Mike Feibus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:46:10 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/2/1/model-years-can-help-lift-pc-sales.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1414047:16734394:32737571</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.feibustech.com/storage/YearDice_Small.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1360696908572" alt="" /></span></span>In my last column, I offered PC vendors some advice on how to position&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/software/operating-systems/what-pc-makers-must-do-now/240146507">Windows 8 systems</a><span>. That's not a miracle cure for solving PC players' woes. All that will do is pry from the industry's hand the pistol it's using to shoot itself in the foot. PC vendors will need to do more if they want to re-inject excitement into their products and get their business back on a growth trajectory.</span></p>
<p>Here's the bottom line: PC vendors need to incorporate model years into their product positioning. You know, like the automobile makers do.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>Smartphones and tablets -- the devices that are eating the PC's lunch -- exploit the model-year concept. Suppliers leverage their annual rollouts to generate pull from consumers, an<span>d consumers respond. PC vendors, meanwhile, continue to manage new releases like it's 1999.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>That's not entirely the OEMs' fault. But it is entirely their problem.</span></span></p>
<p><span>Implementing model years doesn't have to be that complicated. Click <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/desktop/pc-makers-learn-from-car-makers-use-mode/240147559">HERE </a>to find out how.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.feibustech.com/home/rss-comments-entry-32737571.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>PC Industry: Now What?</title><dc:creator>Mike Feibus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:25:04 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/1/18/pc-industry-now-what.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1414047:16734394:32578106</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.feibustech.com/storage/BurningLaptop_Small.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1359733045072" alt="" /></span></span>Early returns confirm what we already knew: that Windows 8's coming-out was no party.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>The problem: Windows 8 is being marketed as a touch-centric OS, and there aren't many touch-enabled systems available.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The percentage of touch-enabled laptops that were shipped in the fourth quarter was miniscule -- less than 1%, according to Digitimes Research. That number is forecasted to grow only to about 10% in 2013. Which means that more disappointing sales are on the horizon.</p>
<p>As I see it, the PC ecosystem has two options if it wants a shot at salvaging 2013: 1) Find a way to reverse that 90:10 ratio, so that the vast majority of systems are&nbsp;<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/byte/personal-tech/desktop-pc/windows-8-upgrade-no-touch-no-good/240012625">touch-enabled</a>, or 2) start marketing non-touch systems to end users.</p>
<p>Read the entire column <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/software/operating-systems/what-pc-makers-must-do-now/240146507">HERE</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.feibustech.com/home/rss-comments-entry-32578106.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Must-See Trends at CES</title><dc:creator>Mike Feibus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 14:57:23 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.feibustech.com/home/2013/1/6/must-see-trends-at-ces.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1414047:16734394:32482362</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.feibustech.com/storage/CES_Small.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1358531179108" alt="" /></span></span>&nbsp;If you want to get the most out of CES, you have to peer around the big TVs and pimped-out automobiles. I'll be keeping an eye on a few key technology trends. They all have the potential to be the next big thing. But will they be? And if so, when?</p>
<p>Read the entire column <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/global-cio/interviews/ces-2103-what-we-want-to-see/240145481">HERE</a>.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.feibustech.com/home/rss-comments-entry-32482362.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>